Heresy at the ABA Journal. One of their regular columnists wrote this piece in an apparent effort to be helpful to other women in the profession. Similar to a one-time "fashion" column commenting on the "rumpled and haggard" appearance of Hillary Clinton, this apostacy got by the witless ABA Journal editors.
However, it did not escape notice by the official keepers of the keys of ABA dogma. They understand that if there is a problem, it has to be systemic discrimination, and it is not the problem of womyn, but the problem of the profession to adjust as necessary in order to fix it.
Unlike the Hillary Clinton heresy, this column was out there too long to simply depublish it in a quiet but expeditious manner. So, instead, we now have the apologetic "Editor's note" added at the beginning. There is also now a separate, rebuttal piece, condemning the ++ ungood opinions in the disfavored column, signed by all the past ABA Presidents who identify as womyn. (Apparently, the male ABA officers could not see it, or are simply Shitlords who have never shared the organization's "core values," despite their grand pretensions to the contrary).
At some point, some weiner at Glawker apparently attacked this column as well. It remains to be seen whether the heretic columnist will still be "allowed" to write for the spineless, subsapient slugs at ABA Journal, or will have to be voted off the sinking garbage scow after some suitable shaming or burning at the stake.
Here is the piece that was deemed so "offensive" that Refo Wom'n and the rest of the Gang of Ten had to call it out en masse and force the ostensibly independent "editor" to add the disclaimer.
No comments:
Post a Comment