WSJ: Winning Lawyers in Supreme Court Gun Case Leave Firm
“Unfortunately, we were given a stark choice: either withdraw from ongoing representations or withdraw from the firm,” Mr. Clement said. “Anyone who knows us and our views regarding professional responsibility and client loyalty knows there was only one course open to us: We could not abandon ongoing representations just because a client’s position is unpopular in some circles.”
Nice to know that if your case or cause become disfavored by the Democratic Party, Kirkland will drop you like a hot potato.
Is it just me or is this a totally unworkable posture for a law firm of this size? Some of the cases I or my employer have been involved in have gotten... media attention, not always positive on the left. I do actually select outside counsel on potentially significant matters, including BigLaw at times, and this profoundly influences me in the negative. Not because I'm pro-gun (though I am), but because the firm being obviously politically influenced in a way that could affect my representation is totally unacceptable. Frankly I'm shocked they would do it, not a good look IMHO.
No comments:
Post a Comment