Ah, the things a young man with an inked NetFlix deal in his pocket will do for love ....$29,000,000 in attorneys fees to sue to protect his lady. How sweet! Honey, you sued for me! This calls for a new Hallmark card!
Never mind that when asked for actual evidence of phone hacking by opposing counsel Harry seemed a bit ignorant of the burden of proof replying "You would have to ask the reporters involved".
Such a sad, sweet, tiresome man whose 15 minutes are up.
Live coverage of this train wreck here: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/prince-harry-court-case-latest-live-b2353276.html
Full story: Prince Harry has no proof Mirror Group journalists hacked phone, court told
The lawyer argued that many of the stories Harry claims were obtained through illegal means had already been published in other newspapers.
The prince told the court that he was still “suspicious” about some of these articles, which often quoted anonymous “royal sources” providing surprisingly detailed information. ergo, I was hacked. Amiright?
The suspicion burden of proof. Maybe it will catch on.
No comments:
Post a Comment